In a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, the renowned podcast host and MMA commentator Joe Rogan made a bold statement that has stirred up the combat sports community. Rogan asserted that Francis Ngannou, the former UFC heavyweight champion, would dominate Tyson Fury, the reigning WBC heavyweight boxing champion, in a “real fight”.
Rogan’s comments came during a discussion with UFC welterweight champion Belal Muhammad. The conversation touched on various aspects of combat sports, including the differences between boxing and mixed martial arts (MMA). Rogan, a long-time advocate for MMA, emphasized the comprehensive nature of the sport, which combines striking, grappling, and submissions.
Joe Rogan’s Perspective
“I love boxing, but we all know if Francis Ngannou and Tyson Fury had a FIGHT fight, that sh*t will not last one round,” Rogan said. He elaborated that while boxing is a highly skilled and disciplined martial art, MMA is closer to real-life combat. According to Rogan, the versatility and range of skills required in MMA give fighters like Ngannou a significant advantage in a no-holds-barred scenario.
Why Francis Ngannou?
Francis Ngannou is known for his incredible knockout power and athleticism. His journey from the streets of Cameroon to becoming the UFC heavyweight champion is nothing short of inspirational. Ngannou’s striking ability, combined with his improved grappling skills, makes him a formidable opponent in any combat sport.
Rogan’s comments have reignited the age-old debate between boxing and MMA. While boxing purists argue that the sport’s focus on striking makes it superior, MMA enthusiasts point to the all-encompassing nature of their sport. The hypothetical matchup between Ngannou and Fury in an MMA setting highlights the fundamental differences between the two disciplines.
SHARE
